Next-Generation Mass Spectrometry Coupled with Microfluidics for Trace-Level Hazmat Analysis

By Dr. Priyom Bose, Ph.D.Reviewed by Lauren Hardaker

Trace-level hazardous materials (Hazmat) analysis involves monitoring, identifying, and quantifying minute concentrations of harmful substances, such as toxic chemicals, volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs), microbes, and heavy metals, to protect humans and the environment.  

Image credit: JU.STOCKER/Shutterstock.com

Numerous organic and inorganic substances are introduced into the environment through various human activities, including deforestation, pollution, industrialization, and chemical spills. The current article focuses on the benefits of next-generation mass spectrometry (MS) coupled with microfluidics for trace-level Hazmat analysis.

Conventional Technique for Trace-Level Hazmat Analysis

Traditionally, scientists have used spectroscopic, electromagnetic, and chromatographic techniques to detect various materials. Several conventional methods have shown low specificity, long analysis times, and limited sensitivity in detecting trace quantities.¹

Spectroscopic methods, such as atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), are typically employed to detect and quantify metals. In contrast, chromatographic methods (e.g., gas chromatography, GC, and liquid chromatography, LC) are used to analyze organic compounds. Often, scientists combine two approaches to enhance detection accuracy.

Each technique comes with its benefits and limitations. For instance, many conventional methods generate false positives due to background radiation, temperature fluctuations, and humidity variations. Additionally, instruments for these techniques, such as GC-MS and ion mobility spectrometry (IMS), are bulky and slow. Thermal imaging is also used for trace-level Hazmat analysis; however, this method is limited by evaporation rates and surface properties.

Image credit: S. Singha/Shutterstock.com

MS Coupled With Microfluidics Devices to Detect Trace Elements

Compared to benchtop instruments, microfluidic device miniaturization offers great benefits in chemical analysis. Besides miniaturization, which promotes reduced use of analytical reagents, microfluidic devices can integrate multiple analytical processes on a single platform, ensuring higher assay sensitivity.² This approach offers parallel analysis domains for automated and high-throughput assays that significantly reduce errors frequently generated from manual sample handling.

Microfluidic devices are integrated with MS through electrospray ionization (ESI).³ Scientists have coupled MS to microfluidic systems to minimize sample and reagent volumes, increase analysis speed, enhance sensitivity, and enable both quantitative and qualitative analysis.

Droplet microfluidic (DMF) systems use an inert carrier fluid to compartmentalize reactants and encapsulate aqueous samples in droplets.⁴ This method generates droplets with volumes ranging from 0.05 pL to 1 nL, which can encapsulate DNA, cells, or other molecules within the aqueous phase while minimizing the risk of cross-contamination. Although theoretical maximums have been reported, DMF systems can screen up to 108 samples in practice in one day. By coupling MS with DMF, scientists can perform high-throughput screening applications.

A microfluidic chip-based multi-channel ionization (MCMCI) system has been developed to extract untreated compounds from complex matrices for trace element analysis using MS.⁵ The microfluidic chip integrates ionization into a miniaturized format, improving processing speed and accuracy.

A microfluidic platform coupled with various detection systems, including MS, supported by high-speed computation and an artificial intelligence (AI) network, significantly accelerates identifying and quantifying pollutants in water and soil samples.⁶ This approach shortens detection time and increases detection efficiency. Combining AI with a microfluidic device has proved to be a powerful tool for predicting heavy metal pollution.

Applications Of Microfluidic-MS Devices for Trace Element Analysis

Uranium And Actinide Separation

A novel microfluidic-MS device has been developed to directly analyze trace elements and uranium directly, minimizing operator-sample interaction.⁷ This device can separate uranium from key trace elements using nitric acid solutions of different concentrations and chromatographic resins for adsorption and recovery. The eluates from this microdevice are diluted and directed to an ICP-MS system for radiochemical analysis. This highly sensitive strategy also lowers the cost of trace elemental analysis.

Biomedical Monitoring of Toxic Metals

Analysis of trace elements is crucial to monitoring the physiological environment. By coupling a microfluidic chip with ICP-MS, researchers enabled the detection of gadolinium in human body fluids.⁸ Gadolinium is a naturally occurring rare earth metal, which is extremely toxic in its free elemental form. Although it is commonly used in MRI scans to enhance image clarity and is considered safe, it may lead to severe kidney dysfunction.

Heavy Metal Detection in Biological Samples

A titanium dioxide-assisted preconcentration/on-site vapor generation chip, coupled with ICP-MS, was developed to detect mercuric ions in urine samples.⁹ Furthermore, three three-dimensional microfluidic devices coupled with ICP-MS have also been designed to detect cadmium, mercury, and lead in a single cell. Long-term exposure to heavy metals may result in neurological problems, including cognitive impairment, memory loss, diminished motor skills, behavioral changes, and kidney dysfunction.

Food Safety and Microbial Detection

Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometry MALDI-MS is a powerful analytical instrument to determine proteins, peptides, and nucleic acids. An automated microfluidic chip coupled with MALDI-MS has been developed to detect spoilage microorganisms in the food industry rapidly.⁸

Chemical Warfare Agents

Using a magnetic bead-based solid-phase extraction, a digital microfluidic device (DMF) extracts and purifies the chemical, and the resultant solution is loaded onto a MALDI plate to determine the chemical warfare agent stimulant.¹⁰

AI-Enhanced Environmental Monitoring

Integrating AI and machine learning in microfluidic devices has significantly enhanced water quality monitoring systems. Scientists have designed a portable, microfluidic-based biosensor to detect mercury in seawater's nanomolar (nM) range.

A machine learning algorithm was developed to analyze fluorescence data generated by a microfluidic device. The dataset was compiled and categorized using actual fluorescence values to predict mercury concentration. This approach enables personnel to monitor on-site marine pollution without specialized training.⁶

Emerging Trends in Multi-Parameter Detection

Currently, scientists are focusing on developing more sophisticated algorithms for microfluidic chip data analysis to enhance the accuracy of contaminant detection. A more advanced multi-parameter detection device equipped with intelligent data analysis will aid in the early detection of trace elements, thereby preventing harmful effects on humans and the environment.

Validation, Regulatory, And Operational Limitations

Despite promising technical advances, several challenges remain before microfluidic-MS devices can be widely deployed for Hazmat detection. Validation of new devices against standardized reference materials is essential to ensure reproducibility and comparability across laboratories. Regulatory approval processes can be lengthy, particularly for systems intended for clinical or defense use, where biosafety and data security requirements are stringent.

Operational limitations also exist. Portable microfluidic-MS systems must be sturdy for field environments and capable of handling variable humidity, temperature, and dust exposure without performance loss. Furthermore, routine calibration and maintenance can limit deployment in resource-limited or emergency-response settings. Addressing these constraints will be critical to translating laboratory innovations into reliable field applications.

Future Outlooks

Looking ahead, integrating microfluidic-MS platforms with cloud-connected data systems and remote AI analysis could enable real-time global monitoring of environmental hazards.

Advances in additive manufacturing may reduce device costs and enable rapid customization for specific threat profiles, from industrial contaminants to chemical warfare agents. Furthermore, a greater focus on interoperability with existing emergency response infrastructure, such as handheld detectors and mobile labs, will enhance operational impact.

While significant work remains, combining microfluidics, next-generation MS, and machine learning has the potential to transform trace-level Hazmat analysis into a faster, more accurate, and more field-deployable technology.

References

1. Li Y, et al. Advances in environmental pollutant detection techniques: Enhancing public health monitoring and risk assessment. Environ Int. 2025;197, 109365. doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2025.109365
2. Das A, Prajapati P. Navigating pharmaceuticals: microfluidic devices in analytical and formulation sciences. Discov Chem. 2025; 2, 49. doi.org/10.1007/s44371-025-00133-y
3. Wang X, et al. Microfluidics-to-mass spectrometry: a review of coupling methods and applications. J Chromatogr A. 2015;1382:98-116. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.10.039.
4. Ha NS, et al. Faster, better, and cheaper: harnessing microfluidics and mass spectrometry for biotechnology. RSC Chem Biol. 2021;2(5):1331-1351. doi: 10.1039/d1cb00112d.
5. Yu C, et al. Multi-channel microfluidic chip coupling with mass spectrometry for simultaneous electro-sprays and extraction. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):17389. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17764-6.
6. Zhang Y, et al. Artificial Intelligence-Based Microfluidic Platform for Detecting Contaminants in Water: A Review. Sensors (Basel). 2024;24(13):4350. doi: 10.3390/s24134350.
7. Han SY, et al. Development of an automated microfluidic system for actinide separation and analysis. J Chromatogr A. 2025;1742:465646. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2024.465646.
8. Chen J, et al. Integrated microfluidic chip coupled to mass spectrometry: A minireview of chip pretreatment methods and applications. J Chromatogra Open. 2021; 1, 100021. doi.org/10.1016/j.jcoa.2021.100021
9. Shih TT, et al. Development of a titanium dioxide-assisted preconcentration/on-site vapor-generation chip hyphenated with inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry for online determination of mercuric ions in urine samples. Anal Chim Acta. 2019;1063:82-90. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2019.02.035.
10. Lee H, et al. Sample preparation of chemical warfare agent simulants on a digital microfluidic (DMF) device using magnetic bead-based solid-phase extraction. Microfluid Nanofluid. 2017;21, 141. doi.org/10.1007/s10404-017-1976-6

Last Updated: Sep 8, 2025